Next-Gen Legal-Aviation Platform: Scaling Enterprise Usability

Led strategic operations for a 'design sprint quarter' consisting of 11 back to back design sprints redesigning digtial aviation regulation services.

The TL;DR

The Mess

Identifying the Problem Space

Legacy Systems
The existing system was a high-friction environment where users were met critical barriers in wayfaring, form logic, and interaction patterns.

The Core Issue
The legacy environment was a 'non-linear journey' that hindered users' ability to complete high-stakes aviation registrations and searches efficiently; occuring in legal workflows where ambiguous labeling could lead to significant operational risk.

The Stakeholders
The internal support team was drowning in high call volumes, indicating gaps in system documentation and process logic.

Descriptive alt text
Image showing digitised True North sticky notes after affinity mapping workshop

The Direction

Strategic Planning & Constraints

Operating under a tight 3-month lifecycle, required me to lead cross-disciplinary work to move from a 'monolithic' system to a modular, micro-service-led architecture validated by real-world data. The objective was to design a user-validated next-generation prototype that met rigorous business goals while remaining strictly user-centric.

I implemented a Lean UX strategy using Design Sprint 2.0 methodology to decouple the redesign into manageable micro-services. The roadmap was divided into 11 sprints, focusing on sitewide restructuring first, followed by use-case-specific modules like Access, Searches, and Registrations.

Project Constraints and Strategic Responses
Constraint Strategy
Global User Variance:
Disparate needs between frequent legal admins and infrequent guest users.
Persona-Driven Architecture:
Identified 4 distinct persona types to balance expert 'power-user' speed with novice 'guest' guidance.
Technical Complexity:
High-stakes aviation registrations involving complex 'multi-object' data.
Design Sprint 2.0:
Decoupled the redesign into 11 use-case-specific sprints to iterate on individual components without stalling the roadmap.
Service Fragility:
Transitioning to cloud during a global pandemic (COVID-19).
Service Blueprinting:
Pivoted to collaborative remote workshops and lean service blueprints to align technology usage with support behaviors.

The Methods

Practical frameworks for Human Activity Systems

Systems Thinking vs. Double Diamond
Rather than a linear process, we utilised a Lean UX/Design Sprint methodology to enable parallel tracks of ideation, prototyping, and testing.

Information Architecture
Conducted Card Sorting to normalise system language and identify natural grouping for complex legal terminology.

Contextual Auditing
Performed thematic analysis of support team interactions to map internal system requirements against user-facing pain points.

Rapid Prototyping
Used Figma to build and test high-fidelity micro-services weekly, ensuring no design was moved to dev without validation from 4-6 users. This also allowed us to conduct usability & prototype testing were rigid security constraints normally prevented screen-based testing.

Descriptive alt text
Digitised Sprint Board for asynchronous sharing of the Design Sprint workshop outputs

The Insights

The "Aha!" Moments of Discovery

The Labeling Criticality
User testing proved that button placement and labeling were not aesthetic choices but risk-mitigation factors in legal workflows.

Process Over Pages
The "Aha!" moment came from identifying that the friction was in the non-linear flow, not individual screens; we solved this by mapping the 'Problem Space' before any interface was designed.

Institutional Intelligence
The internal support team's daily behaviors were the missing link in the service blueprint - we mapped their process to ensure the new UI didn't break existing back-end efficiencies.

Descriptive alt text
Photograph of Design Sprint workshop actvities - Affinity Mapping the shared problem space

The Change

Impacting Together

The co-design (communication, collaboration and decision-making) process was a key enabler of the success of this project. It allowed us to align the needs of the business, users and developers - supporting a quick, efficient and iterative design & validation cycle.

Validated Enterprise Ecosystem
Delivered a fully tested, end-to-end prototype for core functionalities (Access, Searches, Registration).

Scalable Design Language
Architected a Design Pattern Library (Typography, Grid Systems, Interaction Specs) to standardize UI across the platform.

Service Evolution
Created Lean Service Blueprints that facilitated a seamless cloud migration and redefined the account management process.

Metrics of Success
Transitioned from an unknown 'Vision State' to a user-validated Product Roadmap with 100% stakeholder buy-in for the sprint delivery model.

Descriptive alt text
Image of co-created Service Blueprint artifacts - representing a new, aligned service model

The Learning

Project Retrospective

Velocity as a Feedback Loop
This project proved that iterative testing with 4-6 users weekly is the 'sweet spot' for maintaining momentum in enterprise environments.

The Service Design Mindset
I learned that true product leadership requires looking beyond the screen. By mapping the offline support resources and cloud-migration workflows, we ensured the system was resilient to external shocks like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Growth
This project matured my ability to facilitate collaborative mapping with cross-functional product and dev teams, moving the needle from 'designing features' to 'architecting services'.

Fancy a chat?

I'm always interested in new creative projects and collaborations. Let's make something together.